Extra username and password are demanded for this resource. See Username and password webpage for details
“The evidence regarding wajtakkar and extra-judicial confession being relied upon from the prosecution against the petitioner and his higher than mentioned co-accused namely Hussain Bakhsh has already been opined by the Lahore High Court, Lahore in its order dated 2-12-2010 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No.
This Court may perhaps interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer inside of a fashion inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the manner of inquiry or where the summary or finding attained via the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If the summary or finding is for instance no reasonable person would have ever attained, the Court may possibly interfere with the conclusion or maybe the finding and mildew the relief to make it correct into the facts of every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority could be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-enjoy the evidence or even the nature of punishment. On the aforesaid proposition, we have been fortified through the decision of your Supreme Court within the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 252 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Information on accessing opinions and case-related documents for the Supreme Court from the United States is accessible over the court’s website.
94 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is actually nicely-settled that the civil servants must first go after internal appeals within 90 days. In the event the appeal is not decided within that timeframe, he/she can then method the service tribunal to challenge the first order. Once they do so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, as the ninety times for your department to act has already expired. To the aforesaid proposition, we're guided via the decision in the Supreme Court within the case of Dr.
The presiding judge emphasized the need to address the evolving techniques utilized by counterfeiters, noting that the amendment’s inclusion of technological elements allows to get a more in depth legal reaction.
Following the decision, NESPAK, as directed, conducted an assessment on the grid project and submitted that sufficient mitigation measures were in place to render any prospective adverse impacts negligible. Based on this, the grid station was permitted to get crafted.
forty eight . Cr.Misc. 787/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S S.P Complaint Cell Hyderabad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD 12 Justice with the Peace u/s 22-A will not be obliged to afford a chance of hearing on the accused party; nor obliged to necessarily or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; but is necessary to take into account all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid machinery of criminal regulation from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are a lot of the relevant factors. Read more
This system, for use by members from the Virginia State Bar and their designated staff, allows electronic filing of most civil cases in circuit court.
acquitted the appellants from many of the charges therefore the same is dismissed being infructuous. (Criminal Revision )
Legal Defenses: An accused person charged under Section 302 PPC can present legal defenses such as self-defense, insanity, or accidental killing, which may well bring about reduced charges or acquittal.
Article 199 on the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other enough remedy is provided by regulation." It's very well-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust accessible remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether All those remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court more info litigation. Read more
Acquittal nullifies prior guilt and fortifies petitioners' eligibility for appointment. No juridical impediment to appointment following acquittal. Equivalence of acquittals under compromise and criminal procedure code, plus the role of "badal-i-sulh" in restorative justice. Distinction between probationary release and acquittal. Probationary release for a legally acknowledged conviction. Read more
Stacy, a tenant within a duplex owned by Martin, filed a civil lawsuit against her landlord, claiming he had not offered her adequate notice before raising her rent, citing a brand new state regulation that needs a minimum of 90 days’ notice. Martin argues that the new regulation applies only to landlords of large multi-tenant properties.